Developing a clear written pro bono policy and communicating it to the firm is best practice and the most effective way to establish ethical practice that achieves meaningful impact. A policy also helps to set your firm’s narrative and often reflects a firm’s unique culture, so it is worth striving to ensure your policy promotes worthy engagement. A clear policy, whether concise or comprehensive, will set the tone of the pro bono practice from the outset. It is also the central document underpinning the direction of the pro bono practice you wish to create.
For firms reporting against ESG criteria to clients, in tenders, for external accreditation, or as part of membership of external bodies, a pro bono policy is essential to facilitate accountability, transparency and good governance.
- demonstrates the firm’s support of and commitment to pro bono legal work;
- facilitates ownership of pro bono work by the firm’s leadership and people;
- allows individuals in the firm to know how they can become involved;
- acts as a document against which requests for assistance can be assessed and decisions justified;
- aligns the pro bono practice with the firm’s strategy and facilitates integration of pro bono into the business, including by stating how this is achieved;
- enables identification and communication of the purpose of pro bono legal work for the firm; and
- can act as a guide to determining the manner in which pro bono work is to be undertaken or communicated externally.
Key aspects of the pro bono policy are the objectives of the pro bono practice and the criteria for pro bono legal work that the firm is prepared to do. The policy may also describe any non-legal volunteer work that the firm may do as an adjunct to the pro bono practice.
Like all key internal policies, the pro bono policy should be reviewed regularly. Periodic review can also serve as an opportunity for firms to evaluate, reaffirm, restructure and/or create new opportunities and directions for their pro bono practices.
Where a policy is concise, a firm should develop a detailed supporting document outlining relevant protocols and procedures.
See Appendix 1 for a law firm pro bono policy precedent.
- 1.3.1 Developing a policy
- 1.3.2 Contents of a pro bono policy
- 1.3.3 Practice objectives
- 1.3.4 Criteria for pro bono legal work
1.3.1 DEVELOPING A POLICY
Engaging the leadership of the firm in helping to develop a policy is an important foundational step for establishing a pro bono practice with broad support. Leadership engagement will also help to align the policy with the firm’s strategic objectives and ensure it reflects the culture of the firm.
A firm might also encourage broader involvement in the development of the policy. This can heighten awareness of pro bono, generate innovative ideas and projects, and maximise employee ownership of and participation in the practice.
The policy should be approved at the highest level of the firm’s governance structure (for example, by the Board, where required). Once approved, it should be widely and regularly promoted within the firm. For example, the policy could be annually circulated on an internal firm site. It should also be included in materials used for recruitment and induction practices for new employees. Firms should encourage staff to provide ongoing feedback about the policy to, for example, the pro bono partner, committee, leader, or manager.
1.3.2 CONTENTS OF A PRO BONO POLICY
Pro bono policies differ considerably, particularly in relation to the level of detail included. Some firms’ pro bono policies are quite detailed and include guidance on procedures as well as matters of principle, ethics, communication frameworks and structure. Other firms choose to develop separate procedures documents, such as guidelines or manuals, and have fairly brief policy documents. In practice, policies (and/or their supporting procedural guidelines) tend to include:
- a policy statement — generally a statement of commitment made by the firm indicating:
- that pro bono legal work is a professional responsibility of all lawyers;
- why the firm is committed to it;
- that lawyers (and in some cases non-lawyers) are expected and encouraged to participate in the pro bono practice;
- the principle of equal treatment of pro bono legal work — that pro bono legal work must be done to the same standard and given the same priority as the firm’s commercial work;
- practice objectives — the high-level strategic objectives (or goals) of the practice or Theory of Change;
- a definition of pro bono legal work, ideally aligned with the Centre’s definition, for the purposes of the firm’s practice, which also refers to types of volunteer work that fall outside the definition;
- criteria for taking on pro bono legal work or projects, which indicate the practice’s areas of focus and which ensure the practice meets its objectives;
- who is responsible for the practice and its work, including coordination processes, the roles and duties of pro bono committees, partners and managers;
- procedures for assessment and approval, allocation, supervision and responsibility for quality and professionalism, conflict checks, and matter opening and closing. This may also be included in a separate document (for example where a lawyer attends a clinic supervised by an external lawyers or where cross practice collaboration is occurring) ;
- how letters of engagement, costs (including the recovery of costs and adverse costs orders) and disbursements are to be dealt with; and
- how pro bono time is to be recorded and credited.
In addition to the above, the pro bono policies of some firms also cover:
- evaluation criteria, whether for broader strategic objectives or a client’s own evaluation needs;
- referrals and the referral process;
- budgets, benchmarks and targets; and
- an aligned community engagement practice that is not reportable against the National Pro Bono Target (the Target).
1.3.3 PRACTICE OBJECTIVES
Most firms develop clear strategic objectives for their pro bono practices. Objectives can be outward-looking and focused on access to justice (for example, helping address unmet legal need in women and children experiencing disadvantage), designed to boost the performance of the firm’s pro bono practice (for example, meeting the National Pro Bono Target), or internally focused (for example, supporting the firm’s strategic objectives regarding recruitment or staff retention). Most policies will include several practice objectives, and the emphasis will change over time as the policy is reviewed and updated.
Some firms take a strategic approach in the sense that their objectives reflect, or respond to, the current pro bono landscape. One objective, for example, might be to address unmet legal need in a particular region where few other organisations are providing assistance or to a particular client group.
Communicating the practice’s strategic objectives to the firm helps to gain support for resourcing the practice and helps to build strong participation.
Firms may also create a separate strategic plan that sets out the types of projects, partnerships, timeframes, and resources required to meet its strategic pro bono objectives.
1.3.4 CRITERIA FOR PRO BONO LEGAL WORK
Setting criteria for taking on pro bono legal work and clearly outlining these in the policy is an important aspect of developing a structured practice and ensures the practice meets its objectives.
The criteria may specify:
- the nature of the legal work the firm will do and/or will not do;
- the basis on which work will be done — for example whether, or when, reduced fee work will be done;
- areas of law in which the firm will act and/or areas of law that will be excluded, and other considerations such as the public interest;
- types of clients or matters that will be prioritised or that will be excluded;
- firm-related criteria such as overcoming any conflict of interest, the firm/team having relevant expertise and capacity, and benefits to the firm’s community profile; and
- underpinning guidelines and standards as to the manner in which a firm approaches pro bono work.
Each of these types of criteria is discussed further below.
NATURE OF WORK
Firms should determine the nature of the pro bono legal work they are prepared to undertake and outline these in the pro bono policy. Usually this will include providing legal advice and legal representation. Firms that run a pro bono litigation practice often require that each case has reasonable prospects of success and that the client does not have access to assistance from Legal Aid or some other source.
In addition to working directly with clients, many policies permit other types of legal work such as providing community legal education (which involves conducting educational seminars or preparing fact sheets and other legal information for community legal organisations) or doing law reform and policy work (which includes research and submission writing or participating in a policy working party). In addition to assisting the community, these types of work can be enormously satisfying and offer opportunities for lawyers in all areas within the firm to do pro bono legal work. In practice, many firms tend to undertake these activities in conjunction with community legal organisations or other community organisations.
The criteria may also refer to particular models of pro bono legal assistance: for example, accepting case referrals, attending clinics, assisting with outreach practices (including collaborative service models) or engaging in secondment practices.
As an adjunct to the pro bono practice, some firms offer a range of non-legal assistance to not-for-profit organisations or community partners, including the use of meeting rooms, library or research assistance, catering or other facilities, printing or publications assistance, administrative assistance, innovation and technology, public relations and marketing, assistance with fundraising, donation of equipment (for example, desks or computers) and financial donations. While this type of assistance does not fall within the definition of pro bono legal work, and should not be credited or recognised as such, it can be a significant aspect of the firm’s commitment to the community, ESG, or social impact practice. See further: What Works, Chapter 30 (Non-legal assistance).
One firm describes the nature of services provided through its pro bono practice as follows:
- providing advice on commercial and litigious matters;
- undertaking commercial legal work, for example, incorporating associations, drafting contracts, negotiating leases, property work;
- advocacy services;
- negotiation services; and
- assistance to improve laws or the legal system in a manner that will benefit marginalised or disadvantaged individuals or groups.
BASIS ON WHICH WORK IS DONE
The Centre’s definition of pro bono legal services includes ‘giving legal assistance for free or at a substantially reduced fee’. Firms usually choose to retain a degree of flexibility, especially in relation to charging fees for pro bono legal work done for charities and other not-for-profit organisations. If services are to be offered for a reduced fee, clients should be made fully aware of the extent to which they will be required to contribute to the costs of the case and referring agencies need to know that clients may be charged.
The National Pro Bono Target Guidance Notes provide the following reporting guidance as to the meaning of ‘substantially reduced fee’ work:
- Signatories are asked to report separately on pro bono legal services provided for a ‘substantially reduced fee’ compared to pro bono legal services provided for no fee.
- The Centre will only count ‘substantially reduced fee’ hours reported against the Target if those fees have been reduced by at least 50% of what would otherwise be charged for the matter (meaning what would be charged if the matter was not a pro bono matter).
- ‘Substantially reduced fee’ pro bono hours reported to the Centre should only count on a pro rata basis based on the proportion that the reduced fee bears to the fee that would be otherwise charged.
Under a ‘conditional’ costs agreement, no fees are charged unless the client is successful in the matter and the settlement includes a costs component or the court makes an order for costs in the client’s favour. Recovery is then specified to be limited to the amount of the costs component in the settlement agreement or to that ordered by the court or tribunal so that the client effectively pays no legal fees.
Work done on a speculative/no win no fee basis, however, which is done with the commercial expectation of a fee, is not considered pro bono legal work for the purpose of the Target.
AREAS OF LAW
A pro bono policy usually sets out the areas of law in which the firm will or will not act, based on the areas of law in which the firm has expertise or skill sets: for example, larger firms most commonly exclude criminal and family law. A requirement that the firm accept only matters in which it has (or is able to develop) appropriate expertise may be included as a separate criterion. Ideally, the firm’s list of the type of work it will and will not do should be developed with input from referral sources. A firm might decide, for example, that while it will not generally accept criminal law referrals, it will acquire the necessary expertise to assist with apprehended violence order matters because of a particular need and the relative lack of complexity. The policy can set out the manner in which a firm prefers to deal with a mismatch of a client’s legal needs and a law firm’s skill set.
Many firms accept any meritorious casework in relation to which they have expertise, while some give priority to targeted areas, and some restrict their casework to ‘public interest’ matters.
PUBLIC INTEREST TESTS
It can be argued that all pro bono legal work is in the public interest, because it is in the public interest to provide low-income and disadvantaged individuals with greater access to legal services. In a more limited sense, ‘public interest’ is generally used to describe legal work that is intended to advance the interests of a broader group rather than an individual client. Matters raising an issue of public interest fall within the Target’s definition of ‘pro bono legal services’.
The Centre’s Guidance Notes explain that advancing the public interest means that the matter ‘is likely to affect a significant number of people and/or that it raises a matter of broad public concern’.
Similarly, the Centre’s Guidelines for considering a proposed pro bono project for coverage under its National Pro Bono Professional Indemnity Insurance Scheme advise that an ‘issue of public interest’ is best understood as one that is distinct from an issue of private interest, and must be an issue that:
- is likely to affect a significant number of people;
- raises a matter of broad public concern; and/or
- has an impact on disadvantaged or marginalised groups.
As most definitions do not require clients with a public interest matter to meet a means test, it is important that each firm clarifies the meaning of the term if it is included in the firm’s pro bono policy.
Firms have addressed this issue in a number of ways:
- consideration of ‘the significance and potential impact of the matter’ and/or ‘the public policy issues involved’;
- adoption of a policy that, while eligible matters must have reasonable prospects of success, ‘if the matter is of public interest it might be accepted even though its prospects of success are not strong’; and
- requiring that the matter ‘arise[s] from harsh or unjust treatment by a powerful individual, corporation, government or law enforcement agency’.
In relation to the public interest criteria, Justice Connect considers the following:
Public interest can refer to a legal issue involving an important point of law that is uncertain and requires clarification, or a case relating to an important right affecting a sector of the community. On occasion, we also consider assisting people with serious legal issues that will significantly affect their lives, where they would otherwise not access legal assistance, in the public interest..
Another firm, which describes its pro bono practice as ‘public interest work’, has adopted additional criteria — some related to public interest and some not — that are intended to be applied flexibly and inform its choices:
- legal significance — the significance of the matter to the law or to the administration of justice;
- conflicts of interest;
- costs — what resources will be required by the matter or a certain stage of it?
- numbers — how many people will be affected by the outcome of the matter?
- political dimension — is the matter likely to be highly political?
- innovation — would acting in this matter require the firm to be innovative?
- past refusals — who has already said no and why?
- obviousness of match to the firm — some applicants in some matters will be such clear matches to the firm’s strategic alignment and culture that it will be natural to take them on;
- justice question — is there a fundamental justice question that the firm wants to take on?
While requiring pro bono cases to meet a public interest test provides a filter for the firm’s resources and places emphasis on cases that maximise benefit, in practice it is not always easy to apply. One risk is that it can involve the interpolation of ‘the lawyer’s own political and social judgments about the worthiness of causes’, amongst other considerations.
Further, the application of a strict public interest test could mean that people experiencing disadvantage would find it even more difficult to obtain assistance in matters of major importance to them, but which do not raise wider issues.
Other than for some public interest matters, many firms and pro bono referral organisations consider the financial means of clients, and usually take into account whether there is any other assistance (such as Legal Aid) available. The criteria as to the types of clients that firms will act for typically refer to people experiencing disadvantage and/or to people who cannot access the legal system without incurring significant financial hardship. Given the difficulties Legal Aid Commissions have in applying their strict means tests, firms generally do not fix a cut-off at an income or asset amount, as ability to pay varies depending on many factors including number of dependents, liquidity of assets and debt level.
Pro bono legal services may extend to the ‘middle missing’ — clients who fall outside legal aid eligibility guidelines but who are unable to afford a private lawyer. By identifying a client group or a means range, a firm may demonstrate that the clients it takes on clearly fall within its policy objectives of helping to address unmet legal need or helping to address public policy issues.
Some firms have criteria that give priority to clients from specific demographics, such as people living with disabilities, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, and/or clients from a non-English-speaking background. Other firms consider clients who are otherwise vulnerable (such as older clients) or where the work is urgently required, even if the client has some capacity to pay legal fees.
Many firms define their practice as including assisting charities and other not-for-profit organisations that work for people experiencing disadvantage, including community legal centres and advocacy groups. Several firms do not work for organisations with larger economic resources. While a ‘capacity to pay’ means test may be applied to these organisational clients, it needs to be understood within the context that funds expended for legal services are funds that are no longer available for the organisation’s core work. It is worth noting the American Bar Association’s definition of pro bono includes work done for stated kinds of organisations: ‘where the payment of standard legal fees would significantly deplete the organization’s economic resources or would be otherwise inappropriate’.
This approach could make many large charities eligible for pro bono assistance that would otherwise be ineligible, due to their significant available funds.
The Centre’s definition of ‘pro bono legal services’ also includes assisting charities and other not-for-profit organisations where their sole or primary purpose is to work ‘for the public good’. The Centre’s National Pro Bono Professional Indemnity Insurance Scheme Guidelines set out the way in which the Centre will assess whether an organisation will be considered to work ‘for the public good’:
The Centre draws on the framework of the Association of Pro Bono Counsel by using a “mission, matter, means” approach, and applies these factors based on its experience of how Australian law firms decide on the eligibility for pro bono for not-for-profit organisations.
The Centre looks first to the mission of the organisation, then to the nature of the proposed matter and finally the means of the organisation to afford to pay for the proposed work. Other factors may also be relevant (see below). Any one of the mission, matter or means factors alone may be sufficient for the Centre to form the view that the proposed work is pro bono legal work, but in most cases all of these factors will need to be considered. The issue of whether an organisation has the funds that could be used to pay for the legal work will always be considered.
Other factors for consideration may include:
- the constituency ordinarily served by the organisation and their disadvantage (if any);
- the nature and extent of the legal services requested and the possible outcome if legal services are not obtained;
- whether the organisation has been referred by a pro bono legal referral agency; and
- the overall financial position of the organisation.
If the firm’s pro bono clients include social enterprises, it is important to define this category. Social enterprises are not defined in Australian law, but the Centre’s Guidance Notes on reporting ‘pro bono legal services’ note that: ‘… their key characteristics are that they operate as a business seeking to generate revenue and have a primary social, humanitarian, cultural or environmental mission. Social enterprises aim to benefit the public and the community rather than shareholders and owners.’
Further information about when the Centre will consider work for social enterprises to be pro bono legal work is available in Part 2 of the Guidance Notes.
Other criteria that firms often take into account, or include elsewhere in their pro bono policy, are:
- the absence of any conflict of interest (legal or commercial);
- whether the firm has sufficient expertise;
- whether the relevant lawyers, and the firm as a whole, has capacity to do the work;
- whether the matter affords opportunities for staff development; and
- whether the matter aligns with the firm’s community engagement.
GUIDELINES, STANDARDS AND ETHICS
It is important that pro bono practice is grounded in best practice, is directed appropriately and that firms are aware that they must provide the highest level of service to clients. As it becomes an expectation for firms to establish a pro bono practice and undertake pro bono work, a policy is the ideal document to set standards and ethical principles to underpin the practice and ensure a positive impact is created from the work. It is not enough to just work pro bono hours. There must be substance in the commitment.
In structuring pro bono work, the focus of any activity should be grounded in what the client needs and not just on the firm’s objectives. Firms need to be mindful that clients are often experiencing complex disadvantage or compounding negative circumstances and it is not always appropriate to use clients as a marketing tool for the firm’s benefit or assume by their privilege they know best for a client. Pro bono lawyers must meet the client where they are at, give as much agency in decision making as they can and see common purpose in the work.
Standards of practice in a policy may refer to:
- pro bono work being done to the same standards and professionalism as paid work;
- the setting of clear boundaries for communications so that the firm is not centred in the narratives of justice causes or individual stories;
- establishing core guidelines or principles underpinning the work, e.g. “engaging hearts and minds”, or “empowering clients”;
- link the policy to relevant core firm values and ethos; and / or
- clearly outline that the client must be given agency to work together with lawyers to make decisions about their legal matters.
|Case Study: Gilchrist Connell
“Our firm is sensitive to the complexity of a commercial organisation working in social justice. We are the advantaged in a society that is founded on unfair systems. This means we are often silent in our pro bono programming and remain understated in our profiling. Our Pro Bono Policy reflects that.” Jilly Field, Pro Bono Principal, Gilchrist Connell
Below is an excerpt from the Pro Bono Standards & Ethics section of Gilchrist Connell’s Pro Bono Policy (2022).
6.1 Gilchrist Connell is committed to carrying out pro bono work with the same diligence, professionalism, review and supervision as is done in all commercial work.
6.2 The Pro Bono Principal will monitor the general progress of matters placed in commercial teams. The responsibility of oversight and sign off remains with the relevant Commercial Principal.
6.3 Gilchrist Connell works with a commitment to ethics and transparency in pro bono. Pro bono work is scrutinised for its relevance, appropriateness and merit in both the commercial and social justice sectors.
6.4 Our pro bono work only exists because of the lived experience of individuals facing disadvantage, marginalisation and unfairness. We have an ethical duty to our pro bono clients and front line advocates and will not leverage their experiences for our firm’s profile.
6.5 We recognise and amplify the voice of our pro bono clients in a responsible and appropriate way and take great care in all communications. We strive to understand social equality and promote pro bono but not to be linked or profiled to social justice outcomes.
6.6 Understanding structural barriers and institutional inequality is essential in delivering ethical pro bono responses to social equity. Our pro bono team invests in ongoing training and education in relation to disadvantage, racism, privilege, inequality and shares this knowledge broadly with the firm.
This chapter was reviewed in 2022 by the Australian Pro Bono Centre and the pro bono team at Lander & Rogers, headed by Joanna Renkin. The Centre acknowledges and is grateful for the generous contributions of all those who assisted with the 2022 refresh of the Australian Pro Bono Manual.
 A clear written pro bono policy is also a vital component of any in-house pro bono practice. The commentary that follows is equally applicable in an in-house context.
 For in-house legal teams, the development of the policy may be linked with other internal documents and strategies, or require particular approval processes.
 See: Australian Pro Bono Centre, ‘Guidance Notes on Reporting ‘Pro Bono Legal Services’’, Provide Pro Bono Assistance (Web Page) Note 11 <https://www.probonocentre.org.au/provide-pro-bono/target/guidance-notes/>.
 For further information, see: Australian Pro Bono Centre, ‘Recovery of Costs’, Information on Pro Bono (Web Page) <http://probonocentre.org.au/information-on-pro-bono/case-law/recovery-of-costs/>.
 Australian Pro Bono Centre, ‘Guidance Notes on Reporting ‘Pro Bono Legal Services’’, Provide Pro Bono Assistance (Web Page) <https://www.probonocentre.org.au/provide-pro-bono/target/guidance-notes/>.
 J Anderson and G Renouf, ‘Legal services “for the public good”’ (2003) 28(1) Alternative Law Journal 13; F McLeay, ‘Partners in the same endeavour’ (2003) 28(1) Alternative Law Journal 38.
 See: Australian Pro Bono Centre, ‘Guidance Notes on Reporting ‘Pro Bono Legal Services’’, Provide Pro Bono Assistance (Web Page) Part 2 <https://www.probonocentre.org.au/provide-pro-bono/target/guidance-notes/>.
 Australian Pro Bono Centre, National Pro Bono Professional Indemnity Insurance Scheme: Guidelines for Considering a Proposed Pro Bono Project by In-House Counsel page 2 <http://probonocentre.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/APBC-PI-Scheme-Guidelines-17022016.pdf>.
 For a discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of a public interest test, see: C Arup, Defining pro bono: models and considerations (Briefing Paper, First National Pro Bono Conference, Canberra, 4 August 2000) 8 <www.nationalprobono.org.au/ssl/CMS/files_cms/DefiningProBono-ChristopherArup.pdf>.
 See, for example, the discussion in: Australian Pro Bono Centre, ‘Chapter 5: Where pro bono resources should be directed: greatest need versus achievable goals’, Pro Bono Partnerships and Models – A Practical Guide to What Works (Web Page) pt 2 ch 5 <https://www.probonocentre.org.au/whatworks/part-2/chap-5/>.
 American Bar Association, ‘Rule 6.1: Voluntary Pro Bono Publico Service’ Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 6.1 clause (b)(1) <https://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/rule_6_1_voluntary_pro_bono_publico_service/>.
 Australian Pro Bono Centre, ‘Guidance Notes on Reporting ‘Pro Bono Legal Services’, Provide Pro Bono Assistance (Web Page) Part 2 <https://www.probonocentre.org.au/provide-pro-bono/target/guidance-notes/>.